Beautiful, powerful, expensive and all you want for a Mac desktop.
The rumors circulated a number of announcements ahead of last week's event. But at a time when many consumer hardware items have grown similarly, Apple can still surprise. In a major event launch event, Mac Studio was not a big curveball, indeed, so much so that it is the last sign of a company continuing to transform its personal computer strategy. Nearly a century after the advent of the first Macintosh, the class still has some life left.
A few years ago, I would not feel confident about that statement. Mac was facing a midlife problem. The iPhone had reached the top of the list both in Apple's mindset and revenue share, and the iPad immersed the rest. In terms of innovation, macOS seemed to be caught up in the hot debris from their mobile counterparts.
On the hardware side, on the other hand, it seemed that the company had abandoned the state-of-the-art technology component that once formed an integral part of its foundation, leaving room for products like Microsoft's Surface line to flourish behind it. It tried to arouse some interest about the addition of the Touch bar, but in the end Apple also had to stop the ghost, quietly releasing that unusual test.
Macs a few years ago suffered from bad keyboards (there were cases) and a lack of ports. The latter was easy enough to say until Apple, but that didn't make it a bit biting.
But by 2020, the paradigm changed again. Appropriately, it was another direct result of the iPhone R&D that brought about change. But this time it was not an addition to another iOS app. Years ago, Apple had connected Mac hardware when it switched to upgrading its iPhone internal chip. In most of the company’s existence, it prefers to go it alone where possible, and the development of its first-class silicon provided that opportunity in new in-depth ways.
It was a matter of time before Apple followed the Mac. The company ended its first year of the epidemic with the release of the M1 chip - and with it, a host of new Macs: MacBook Air, Pro and Mini. Updates were almost unanimous: the Mac was back - at least in terms of performance. As anyone who has ever renovated a house or redesigned a website can tell you, the teardown release took time, and that first round of the M1 sounded like a new engine in an old body.
Last May, Apple unveiled a new 24-inch iMac, which brought a new silicon to the new build - the basic reconstruction of every single item in about a decade and a half. That's a lifetime or two in this world. I do not use the word “cute” too much to refer to hardware devices. Cute is not for rabbits and kids. But also the 2021 iMac. She's beautiful, but she's strong. I’ve been using the desktop as my daily driver for the better part of the year (I don’t leave my apartment like I used to), and I’ve never had moments that felt like I was pushing the M1 over. its boundaries.
Considering that 24 inches is a realistic enough space for you, I can still wholeheartedly recommend the iMac to many users - especially those, like me, who have space issues. Really, my only problem is when it comes to yellow.
All that is said, if I have to choose, I believe I will point to last October as the real birth of the modern Mac. I've heard it myself. In addition to the new hardware, the latest MacBook Pro introduces a new hardware version. I don’t think I’m talking outside of school when I say that Apple is often so focused on its design decisions that public opinion can get inside the system. Read one of Devin's lovely stories on the iPhone SE, and you'll see what I mean. Loss of desirable features. Sometimes in the name of progress and sometimes because of aesthetics, but it is always difficult.
Last year's Pro felt different. Our happy staff was just as happy when it was revealed. After years of capture, it was the Mac that sounded as uncompromising as the new chips of M1 Pro and Max enabled it. It was a simple recommendation for Mac users, no doubt full of other recent Mac releases.
So, where does Mac Studio fall into all of this? It is far more complex than it first appears. First of all, as I mentioned above, the product installation was a surprise. Ahead of the desktop, the 27-inch iMac sounded like a sure bet recently last week. The product would rise from last year and fill the void left by the iMac Pro - a product, which, if you look back, was a gap when the company repaired its M1 highway and repaired a moving ship. Mac Pro was.
Will there be a 27-inch iMac? Most likely, no. Reports suggest that one isn’t imminent, and frankly, there’s probably too much overlap with the Mac Studio. With last year’s model, the iMac effectively returned to its rightful place as Apple’s entry-level desktop — albeit a quite powerful one, as that bar rose across the line with the arrival of M1. Its color scheme certainly places it in the proud tradition of products like the iPod and iPhone Mini.
The price, too, is much more complicated than it first appears. The M1 Mac Mini currently starts at $ 699, while the iMac M1 starts at $ 1,299. Mac Studio, meanwhile, starts at $ 1,999 - successfully the price of the two products combined. When things get really bad the iMac is the only third device that comes with its own built-in display. The bottom line is that you do not need to go with a first-person display, if you want to save money or have a better screen left.
As a result of this review, of course, we are including the Studio display, because it is the one sent by Apple. That would add another $ 1,599 to your first tab, bringing us to ~ $ 3,600. Soon we will be talking about real money here. As tested, we’re talking about the M1 Max here - with a 32-core GPU, 64GB RAM and 1TB storage, which puts us at $ 2,799. Looking for M1 Ultra? That starts at $ 3,999 and goes up to $ 7,999. At that price point, however, we discuss the needs of <.1% for Mac users here (not the actual number, mind).
Source: TechCrunch
Predictably, the system performed comparably to last year’s M1 Max Pro in GeekBench. It scored 1790/12851 on the Apple Silicon test, versus the MacBook’s 1781/12674 and 1337/9975 to the laptop’s 1348/9949 on the Intel version. It edged out the MacBook in the GFXBench Metal test, as well, at 307 to its 279.6. Unfortunately, we weren’t able to get our hands on the Ultra chip, but the results were extremely impressive here, nonetheless.
Source: TechCrunch
After Apple unveiled another Mac Pro at last week's event, you should be wondering where the company came from here. Where is the M2? Maybe, but still, there is no tone of people in need, either to give a full Pixar film or to develop really high quality VR content. Those people are there, anyway, and there will be a lot of them, going on. And, more than laptops, it is important to prove these devices in the future. You will need a $ 3,000 desktop for a short stay.
Like the new Pro, there are fewer trades here than there are, on the Mac Mini. First and foremost ports. Ports are important. They let your stuff interact with other things. The Studio plays two USB-C ports on the front, and an SD reader. The last one, in particular, is the one you keep in touch with, so it helps to have it in advance. On the other side there are two USB-Cs, two USB-As (something I missed on the iMac), ethernet, headphone jack and HDMI on the outside (but not inside). Add to Studio Display and get four more ports.
Even more so than the Studio itself, the Studio Display fills an important hole in the Apple lineup. Keep in mind, Apple completely got out of the first-party display game for some time before the arrival of the $5,000 Pro Display XDR. Like the Mac Pro or M1 Ultra, Pro Display XDR is more monitor than most people will need. If you’re keen to get a first-party Apple monitor, the 27-inch, 5K Retina Apple Studio Display is plenty of screen for most. For another $300, the anti-reflective coating, coupled with nano textured glass, dramatically reduces glare, which is nice for pro and non-pro users, alike.
Tags:
Apple